New York Times Editorial on Arkansas Prison Policy

14 10 2009

This story illustrates the absurdity that often goes on inside the prison system.

Shawanna Nelson, a nonviolent offender, was 29 years old and six months pregnant when she arrived in Arkansas’s McPherson Unit prison in 2003. When she went into labor, she was taken to a civilian hospital. Although there was no reason to consider her a flight risk, her legs were shackled to a wheelchair, and then, while she went through labor, to the sides of a hospital bed.

Ms. Nelson testified that the shackles prevented her from moving her legs, stretching or changing positions during the most painful part of her labor. She offered evidence that the shackling had caused a permanent hip injury, torn stomach muscles, an umbilical hernia that required an operation and extreme mental anguish.

In a suit against prison officials, Ms. Nelson charged that her Eighth Amendment right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment had been violated. She won an early ruling from the trial court, but a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit rejected her suit. Now the full appeals court has reversed that decision, ruling, with a 6-to-5 vote, that a jury could find that Ms. Nelson’s shackling was unconstitutional. The court relied in part on a 2002 Supreme Court holding that Alabama’s practice of tying prisoners to a hitching post violated the Eighth Amendment.

Read the New York Times article here.





West Memphis business proprietors being sued for $4.1 million

26 11 2007

Bank of America is suing two businessmen who ran a West Memphis company in an attempt to collect $4.1 million.

Theodore M. Jenney of Holley, N.Y., and Stanley J. Chiras of Florida are the principals of Diaz Intermediates Corp., which produced chemicals that were supplied to Tetra Industries and other agriculture and pharmaceutical clients.

In September 2002, the company borrowed $6.5 million and eventually went out of business.

But Jenney and Chiras had each signed guarantees for half of the unpaid principal, plus any interest, court costs and other fees if Diaz defaulted on the loan. In January, the bank notified the two businessmen that the loan was in default. In May, BOA told Jenney and Chiras to pay off the loan, but they didn’t.

The bank has sued in U.S. District Court to collect the money.





Pay Check Loans Constitutional?

21 11 2007

Some have wondered if the wildly high interest rates charged for pay check loans violate constitutional usury limitations. Apparently not. Judge Barry Sims found the 1999 law to be constitutional. However, his decision will be appealed to the Arkansas Supreme Court…with 400 % interest.

More here.





Developers Sue City of Harrisburg

19 11 2007

Two developers said they are out nearly $1 million after they built homes at the city of Harrisburg’s request, but the city hasn’t installed the water and sewer lines.

Tom Ford and Charles Dunham, who own Ford/Dunham Subdivision, are suing the city of Harrisburg, the mayor and the city council alleging breach of contract, fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The developers are seeking nearly $8 million in damages in Poinsett County Circuit Court.

In 2006, city of Harrisburg officials asked Ford to build moderately priced homes in a section of Harrisburg, according to the lawsuit. In exchange, the city would install water and sewer lines to the homes.

After four homes were built, at a cost of $258,000, the city then backed out of supplying the utilities, the lawsuit said.

“The refusal of the Defendants to honor the agreement has made the constructed residence virtually unsellable and uninhabitable,” the lawsuit said.

Read the whole story at Arkansasbusiness.com.





Louisiana Jury to Decide Katrina Homeowner Insurance Claim

5 11 2007

A Louisiana jury will begin hearing arguments today in that state’s first civil trial involving allegations that State Farm Fire & Casualty wrongly denied homeowner insurance claims from Hurricane Katrina. The trial is expected to test the insurer’s anti-concurrent causation clause, which has allowed the company to deny claims for damages that occurred from a combination of wind and water damage. Courts in Mississippi have heard similar cases but contractual language in Louisiana differs slightly.

Whole article here.